01 May 2007
A 42-year-old female patient, Mrs L, attended her GP complaining of rectal bleeding. This was bright red with no associated symptoms. The patient was otherwise in good health. On examination, including rectal, no abnormality was found and a presumptive diagnose made of haemorrhoids.
Mrs L attended for various other medical matters and later presented with weight loss and feeling tired some eighteen months after her first presentation with rectal bleeding. On examination only minimal weight loss was noted. No further examination was documented.
Shortly after this appointment Mrs L telephoned and asked for a prescription to treat constipation. This was provided after a discussion with her GP who asked the patient to attend the surgery.
At review Mrs L confirmed a history of constipation and that in addition she had rectal bleeding. The GP noted her earlier diagnosis of haemorrhoids. No note was made of any examination being carried out. The patient was referred for surgical review.
At surgical review, three months later, Mrs L was diagnosed with colorectal carcinoma. She required extensive investigation, radiotherapy and surgery. During this time she intimated a claim for negligence alleging delay in the diagnosis of colorectal cancer.
Ultimately settlement was negotiated with the patient because of several weaknesses in defending the case:
01.02.12
GMC announces PLAB review
30.01.12
BDA expresses concern over online patient feedback
27.01.12
GDC issues guidance on ethical advertising
26.01.12
"Gagging clauses" unacceptable says GMC
20.01.12
GMC website to support doctors referred on health grounds